The EU is hopeful it can reach a deal on a raft of measures aiming to slash red tape, increase transparency and supercharge domestic production to respond to growing security threats – but significant issues remain regarding autonomy, risking the continent’s security.
ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
On Tuesday, members of the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Cypriot EU Council presidency representing member states met in Brussels to rubber-stamp the so-called “Defence Readiness Omnibus” — a set of measures proposed a year ago and aimed at streamlining processes for the defense industry.
But divisions have emerged regarding the details of the proposals, particularly the eligibility criteria. The talks expose a longstanding tension between deeper European defense integration and governments’ desire to retain sovereign control over procurement and industrial policy.
Europe’s ability to deter aggression and respond to crises has been thrust to the limelight following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 amid an increasingly distant US President Donald Trump from transatlantic relations.
Trump has repeatedly threatened to pull out of the NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and has escalated rhetoric about annexing Greenland. The EU high representative Kaja Kallas has warned of Moscow’s motivations and stressed the importance of Europe becoming more self-reliant.
“Russia is gearing up its military for a long-term confrontation with the West,” Kallas recently cautioned in Tallinn, Estonia.
“Whether (Vladimir) Putin dares to test NATO at some point, depends entirely on us. Deterrence works if it is credible, showing weakness only invites aggression.”
Amid institutional calls to rearm, Europe’s defense industry has asked for more consistency and less red tape. The EU executive has itself acknowledged delays of up to one-year when it comes to greenlighting certain defense authorization processes.
“We aren’t procuring what we have pledged and Russia sees weakness,” one diplomatic source told Euronews on condition of anonymity, adding that stockpiles are empty and the industry claims no orders have been filled by governments.
As a result of this, the Commission has proposed the omnibus — spanning three key files — born out of the input of over 34 European defense companies on how to scale-up production and meet this need. These spans streamline joint procurement rules, simplifying access to the European Defense Fund (EDF) and creating more predictable rules for industry.
A Cypriot official said they are “working hard” to deliver the entire omnibus package within their term, which winds up at the end of June. Another negotiator close to the work says there are “many open issues”.
Henrik Dahl, a Danish MEP and one of the key negotiators behind the omnibus file focusing on permits, said early Tuesday morning before another round of trilogue debates kicked off that compromises could be within reach, despite their slow pace.
“We would like to conclude the trialogue today,” Dahl said.
He said he expected middle ground to be found on issues like a transparency register and establishing a single point of contact for communication — but that Europe cannot wait and some files are moving “really slowly”.
“We have to be ready by 2030 now. Every day counts,” he said, adding, “I hope we can finish this.”
A source close to the negotiations has confirmed that after much discussion there was a breakthrough on defense readiness and permit-granting – with one of the biggest headaches, eligibility criteria, remaining.
Eligibility criteria proving problematic
The Commission’s proposal aims to incentivize defense procurement for projects that include the participation of three member states, among other caveats.
This preference varies from each member state, with the French traditionally pushing for stricter European preference rules, while countries like Poland wanting variety.
European governments jealously guard any issues that might affect their national sovereignty in an area as sensitive as defense policy.
One diplomatic source said the tightening of the criteria rules could “have an impact on the sovereignty of member states for defense-related matters.” Another source reiterated this, stating: “European governments might have different interests at stake to determine when a product is sensitive or not.”
“The Commission cannot just remove this national prerogative saying this is too complicated,” they said.
The latest report by the European Defense Agency (EDA), collating the major trends defense across the continent, stated last year that defense expenditure reached an unprecedented €343 billion. This represents a 19% rise from 2023, bringing spending to 1.9% of gross domestic product. The EDA attributes most of this to “geopolitical shifts” and calls from Trump to ramp-up NATO defense spending targets.
However, factors such as “legitimate industrial interests, bureaucratic complexity, protracted decision-making processes and unaligned planning cycles often hamper collaborative defense programs”, the report states. More “collaboration” and less “fragmentation” is required.
But the trilogue is not the end of the road. Once approved at negotiations, it would then need to be rubber stamped at the European Parliament before requiring support from the 27 EU member states at a summit attended by the Council of the European Union.
Questions remain, however, about whether time is on the bloc’s side.
Several national security services have warned that Russia could be able to attack the European Union by the end of the decade, and that the 27 EU member states are not yet adequately prepared.
European Commissioner for Defense Andrius Kubilius has also previously stressed that the EU is not “grasping the biggest challenge”.
“We need to be ready to fight not only the wars of today but also the wars of tomorrow,” he said roughly a month before proposing the omnibus, last year.
“And our ability to fight the future wars will very much depend on our ability to radically innovate in defense.”